Went for second opinion from other doc about my failed CXL
Posted: Tue 07 Aug 2012 5:58 pm
Just in short: I had CXL done in my left eye about a year ago, went from 0.6 corrected vision capacity to 0.1 with glasses. I am about to se a lens specialist this friday to get his opinion. I could not tolerate hard lenses 10 years ago which was the last time i tried them. Today is one year post op and earlier I have gotten no explanation why my vision has gotten so much worse.
Today I had a second opinion from my usual doctor. Her hospital do not do CXL at the moment although a study is ongoing to see wether this procedure is safe or not. This is why i was sent to another region hospital to get the treatment.
However my doc looked at me today and could se some haze and also some cloudiness ( She described this looked the same as on persons post op LASIK). She could not explain why this was the situation a year after the procedure and had not seen this is her trial patients so far. Also the cornea was a bit thinner according to the orbscan pictures pre and post op. Should`nt the cornea become thicker post op? She also had me look into a "needle hole" and was quite sure that my visual problems are related to my cornea cause i could see better thru the hole. Astigmatism has increased from 3,5 to 4,5.
I also asked her if the other doctor was right treating me with CXL since i was then 33 years of age and my vision / KC had not progressed that much in latest years (I was diagnosed with KC 15 years ago). She said to me that she would not have done it because of my age, current KC progression was absent and that I could see as good as 0,6 with glasses.But would not judge other doctors. So the question is as follows....
1) Have the CXL treating doctor made mistake, or even worse have he acted in the wrong way with bad judgement putting me in this situation. What could be the risks of treating patients that not are included in the criterias "suitable for CXL?
2) My ordinary doctor wanted to see me in another six months ( 18 months post op) to se if haze and cloudiness would disappear. She could not tell if the thinner cornea, minimal haze and cloudiness would affect my vision. But she also said that there would be foolish to take a chance doing a transplant in that eye more time would do the trick. What do you guys think. Is it possible for haze and cloudiness of cornea to disappear with more time? Whats is more likely that this come from the KC it self or from CXL?
Lynn or some other competent person I am eager for your response..
Today I had a second opinion from my usual doctor. Her hospital do not do CXL at the moment although a study is ongoing to see wether this procedure is safe or not. This is why i was sent to another region hospital to get the treatment.
However my doc looked at me today and could se some haze and also some cloudiness ( She described this looked the same as on persons post op LASIK). She could not explain why this was the situation a year after the procedure and had not seen this is her trial patients so far. Also the cornea was a bit thinner according to the orbscan pictures pre and post op. Should`nt the cornea become thicker post op? She also had me look into a "needle hole" and was quite sure that my visual problems are related to my cornea cause i could see better thru the hole. Astigmatism has increased from 3,5 to 4,5.
I also asked her if the other doctor was right treating me with CXL since i was then 33 years of age and my vision / KC had not progressed that much in latest years (I was diagnosed with KC 15 years ago). She said to me that she would not have done it because of my age, current KC progression was absent and that I could see as good as 0,6 with glasses.But would not judge other doctors. So the question is as follows....
1) Have the CXL treating doctor made mistake, or even worse have he acted in the wrong way with bad judgement putting me in this situation. What could be the risks of treating patients that not are included in the criterias "suitable for CXL?
2) My ordinary doctor wanted to see me in another six months ( 18 months post op) to se if haze and cloudiness would disappear. She could not tell if the thinner cornea, minimal haze and cloudiness would affect my vision. But she also said that there would be foolish to take a chance doing a transplant in that eye more time would do the trick. What do you guys think. Is it possible for haze and cloudiness of cornea to disappear with more time? Whats is more likely that this come from the KC it self or from CXL?
Lynn or some other competent person I am eager for your response..