Cross Linking
Posted: Thu 26 Jul 2012 6:42 pm
Hi Everyone,
I've just had a recent check up at Bristol Eye Hospital, and been advised to consider Cross Linking. This doesn't appear to be widely available on the NHS, certainly not in the Bristol area, and I am looking at private options. Having spoken to a couple of private providers in London, I am left raising a couple of questions in understanding what I need, which is:
Does modern cross linking treatment NOT require the Epithelium to be removed? One hospital advised that they do not remove the epithelium as it has proven to possibly damage the cornea, and that there is something they mix with the riboflavin to help absorb the drops whilst another hospital have said they wouldn't decide on this without seeing the condition of my cornea at the moment. Is this reccomended or not? Do we know of any research to suggest one way or the other? I don't want to risk damaging my cornea anymore!
If Cross linking speeds up the "aging process" of your cornea, what do we know about "older" corneas in terms of long term effects of cross linking? I appreciate this is a relatively new procedure, with not a great deal of history, there aren't a lot of arguements over not having cross linking, most feedback has been positive, which is a help in deciding,
I haven't found many risks listed, I know if I leave it, my condition could get worse, so I have nothing to loose really, but thought I would ask peoples opinions on risks and how those who have had cross linking have found it?
Thanks
Claire
I've just had a recent check up at Bristol Eye Hospital, and been advised to consider Cross Linking. This doesn't appear to be widely available on the NHS, certainly not in the Bristol area, and I am looking at private options. Having spoken to a couple of private providers in London, I am left raising a couple of questions in understanding what I need, which is:
Does modern cross linking treatment NOT require the Epithelium to be removed? One hospital advised that they do not remove the epithelium as it has proven to possibly damage the cornea, and that there is something they mix with the riboflavin to help absorb the drops whilst another hospital have said they wouldn't decide on this without seeing the condition of my cornea at the moment. Is this reccomended or not? Do we know of any research to suggest one way or the other? I don't want to risk damaging my cornea anymore!
If Cross linking speeds up the "aging process" of your cornea, what do we know about "older" corneas in terms of long term effects of cross linking? I appreciate this is a relatively new procedure, with not a great deal of history, there aren't a lot of arguements over not having cross linking, most feedback has been positive, which is a help in deciding,
I haven't found many risks listed, I know if I leave it, my condition could get worse, so I have nothing to loose really, but thought I would ask peoples opinions on risks and how those who have had cross linking have found it?
Thanks
Claire