A strange new twist / graft
Posted: Mon 23 Jul 2007 4:30 pm
Hi guys,
The whole way I view my KC and treatment thereof has just been up-ended today...
I have mild KC in my right eye (6/36 and double images). The left is worse, I cannot see an eyechart beyond a series of white rectangles and see 16 extra images. I have been using rgps wich give me something like 6/6 and 6/9 but there are a number of problems:
1. I am really struggling to get more than about two consecutive days lens wear even using non-preseerved solns. Hayfever has been a major problem in this.
2. For my work I really need to get 12-18 hours regularly to be allowed to do the full range of duties. Being unable to do so, I have had to forgoe any chance of career progression and will very possibly loose my job altogether.
I recently attended my NHS eye hospital with respect to my lens wear problems. The Opthamologist is minded to keep going with the lenses. he is not at all keen on C3R and luke warm on intacs. Grafts he tells me arre for "blind or nearly blind". Although, he is very sympathetic about the career issues; he would rather keep plugging away with the lenses. Although I respect his training, knowledge and years of experience; I was a little disappointed because I do not feel that I can rely on lenses, they always let me down when I need them. I also work in a fairly rugged and very wet environment, so I am always worried about loosing the lenses anyway.
Despite all this, the advice he gave me and the stuff I have read here leads me to accept this corporate wisdonm: stick with the lenses!
This was all turned on its head today.
I attended a Naval Hospital Eye Clinic today in Gosport. I work for the Royal Navy and we manage to double up on most NHS specialisations, with our own doctors. The purpose of the visit was obstensibly to define the how the Navy would deal with me long term, ( am looking at possible discharge in November)
However, I was bowled over when the opthomologist strongly recommended a graft. His thinking was this:
-The chance of rejection is very low.
-I will probably get better eyesight and for years to come.
-In my left eye at least: what have I got to loose?
I was amazed at his very quick decision and clarity of judgement. Apparently the individual is very pro-active and has actively challenged Navy policy on these kind of issues all his career. He was the first for example in the Navy to use Laser eye surgery (not for KC). I ahve to say, I am excited by the idea, I never thought it could be on the cards. He will get my Doctor to refer me to Moorfields or Birmingham with his recommendation. He thinks because the Navy will fund it, there could be less resistance. I am worried that when I get to Moorfields / Birmingham I will get the same response as Gartnavel?
Is this a forlorn hope I wonder? My KC is not as bad as those who typically qualify for grafts and there are obviously risks. On the other hand, the current strategy will almost certainly loose me my career and the option of lots of others in similar fields.
Without inflaming the contact lens debate (please), I wonder what the reaction to this is?
The whole way I view my KC and treatment thereof has just been up-ended today...
I have mild KC in my right eye (6/36 and double images). The left is worse, I cannot see an eyechart beyond a series of white rectangles and see 16 extra images. I have been using rgps wich give me something like 6/6 and 6/9 but there are a number of problems:
1. I am really struggling to get more than about two consecutive days lens wear even using non-preseerved solns. Hayfever has been a major problem in this.
2. For my work I really need to get 12-18 hours regularly to be allowed to do the full range of duties. Being unable to do so, I have had to forgoe any chance of career progression and will very possibly loose my job altogether.
I recently attended my NHS eye hospital with respect to my lens wear problems. The Opthamologist is minded to keep going with the lenses. he is not at all keen on C3R and luke warm on intacs. Grafts he tells me arre for "blind or nearly blind". Although, he is very sympathetic about the career issues; he would rather keep plugging away with the lenses. Although I respect his training, knowledge and years of experience; I was a little disappointed because I do not feel that I can rely on lenses, they always let me down when I need them. I also work in a fairly rugged and very wet environment, so I am always worried about loosing the lenses anyway.
Despite all this, the advice he gave me and the stuff I have read here leads me to accept this corporate wisdonm: stick with the lenses!
This was all turned on its head today.
I attended a Naval Hospital Eye Clinic today in Gosport. I work for the Royal Navy and we manage to double up on most NHS specialisations, with our own doctors. The purpose of the visit was obstensibly to define the how the Navy would deal with me long term, ( am looking at possible discharge in November)
However, I was bowled over when the opthomologist strongly recommended a graft. His thinking was this:
-The chance of rejection is very low.
-I will probably get better eyesight and for years to come.
-In my left eye at least: what have I got to loose?
I was amazed at his very quick decision and clarity of judgement. Apparently the individual is very pro-active and has actively challenged Navy policy on these kind of issues all his career. He was the first for example in the Navy to use Laser eye surgery (not for KC). I ahve to say, I am excited by the idea, I never thought it could be on the cards. He will get my Doctor to refer me to Moorfields or Birmingham with his recommendation. He thinks because the Navy will fund it, there could be less resistance. I am worried that when I get to Moorfields / Birmingham I will get the same response as Gartnavel?
Is this a forlorn hope I wonder? My KC is not as bad as those who typically qualify for grafts and there are obviously risks. On the other hand, the current strategy will almost certainly loose me my career and the option of lots of others in similar fields.
Without inflaming the contact lens debate (please), I wonder what the reaction to this is?