Hi, my KC history and some questions....
Posted: Fri 13 Jun 2014 1:58 pm
Hi All,
I was diagnosed with KC when I was about 13 and wore eyeglasses initially. I tried RGP contacts when I was about 18 but lasted only a couple of weeks with them due to the massive discomfort I experienced wearing them. I have the condition only in my left eye, and the vision in that eye has been absolutely awful (to the point that if I cover my right eye I wouldn't be able to recognise the fuzzy object in front of me was male or female, black or white, what they were wearing) since I was about 18.
Roll on 20 years (I'm 38 now) and it's got marginally worse over the years (the "noise" from the left eye is working it's way further towards the centre of my vision), but up until the last 6 months or so I've never had any discomfort from it, except for it aching occasionally when I am very tired. What I've noticed recently is that it is aching more and more, and also has started to sometimes be irritating when I blink.
Naughtily (and in retrospect stupidly), I've not done anything to get it treated or even looked at for a long time (I've not been to the opticians for about 16 or 17 years), primarily due to my right eye's vision being very good (and has not deteriorated in that time - my glasses from 18 years ago are still accurate for my right eye when I very occasionally use them).
Based on the recent change I finally decided to do some research and then contacted my insurance company (Pruhealth through my IBM company healthcare scheme) who have informed me of the following:
- They will cover a consultation with a specialist provided I am referred by either my GP or an optician (I have an optician's appointment tomorrow morning);
- Cross-linking would likely be covered;
- Ring would NOT be covered;
- Corneal transplant would NOT be covered.
The lady stated that the reasoning for not covering the 2 above are that they would cover the underlying condition (and cross-linking would be deemed to be slowing down the effects of the condition), but would not cover anything related to long/short sight correction, and they deemed that a transplant would not fall within this remit, and my worry is that I'm totally convinced that due to the poor level of vision in the eye that a transplant would be the only viable option.
What are the views and experiences of the knowledgeable folks here? Is this typical? Should they be covering it? What are the likely costs if I were to pay for the surgery myself privately?
Thanks in advance,
Mark
====
I was diagnosed with KC when I was about 13 and wore eyeglasses initially. I tried RGP contacts when I was about 18 but lasted only a couple of weeks with them due to the massive discomfort I experienced wearing them. I have the condition only in my left eye, and the vision in that eye has been absolutely awful (to the point that if I cover my right eye I wouldn't be able to recognise the fuzzy object in front of me was male or female, black or white, what they were wearing) since I was about 18.
Roll on 20 years (I'm 38 now) and it's got marginally worse over the years (the "noise" from the left eye is working it's way further towards the centre of my vision), but up until the last 6 months or so I've never had any discomfort from it, except for it aching occasionally when I am very tired. What I've noticed recently is that it is aching more and more, and also has started to sometimes be irritating when I blink.
Naughtily (and in retrospect stupidly), I've not done anything to get it treated or even looked at for a long time (I've not been to the opticians for about 16 or 17 years), primarily due to my right eye's vision being very good (and has not deteriorated in that time - my glasses from 18 years ago are still accurate for my right eye when I very occasionally use them).
Based on the recent change I finally decided to do some research and then contacted my insurance company (Pruhealth through my IBM company healthcare scheme) who have informed me of the following:
- They will cover a consultation with a specialist provided I am referred by either my GP or an optician (I have an optician's appointment tomorrow morning);
- Cross-linking would likely be covered;
- Ring would NOT be covered;
- Corneal transplant would NOT be covered.
The lady stated that the reasoning for not covering the 2 above are that they would cover the underlying condition (and cross-linking would be deemed to be slowing down the effects of the condition), but would not cover anything related to long/short sight correction, and they deemed that a transplant would not fall within this remit, and my worry is that I'm totally convinced that due to the poor level of vision in the eye that a transplant would be the only viable option.
What are the views and experiences of the knowledgeable folks here? Is this typical? Should they be covering it? What are the likely costs if I were to pay for the surgery myself privately?
Thanks in advance,
Mark
====